Hoy, kumusta? Welcome back to Kaisipan!

Pax Silica. Sounds like yung Roman peace treaty, pero this is actually America declaring who gets to build the future of AI—and they're inviting the Philippines to join.

US Under Secretary Jacob Helberg just confirmed. The Philippines will get a formal invitation to join Pax Silica. Hindi ito basta press release lang. Helberg personally met with Philippine officials twice already, discussing supply chain security, and he's planning a face-to-face meeting in Washington to move things forward.

Ano ba talaga ang Pax Silica? It's the first global initiative where countries are organizing around compute, semiconductors, minerals, and energy as shared strategic assets. Translation: the countries that control these resources control the AI economy.

"If the 20th century ran on oil and steel, the 21st century is going to run on compute and minerals," sabi ni Helberg. And the US is building an alliance to make sure they—and their partners—own those rails.

The founding members? Japan, South Korea, Australia, UK, Singapore, and Israel. Iba-iba ang industries nila, pero lahat may unique capabilities. Singapore has deep semiconductor manufacturing, Israel has startups, Korea and Japan have refining and robotics. Taiwan? They're at the table too, contributing in semiconductor and manufacturing sessions, kahit hindi sila founding member.

Bakit kasama ang Pilipinas sa usapan? Because we have critical minerals and we're positioned in the lower-end semiconductor value chain. Helberg didn't give specifics, but he emphasized the Philippines is "an essential and valued partner" and expressed enthusiasm about deepening supply chain collaboration.

The bigger context? This isn't just about signing papers. Helberg made it clear: "We're not just writing code. The goal is to pour concrete, smelt steel, and rack servers." They're talking actual infrastructure projects, co-investments, joint ventures—physical buildouts, not whitepapers.

But ano nga ba yung role ng PH? Dito medyo vague pa. Manufacturing? Minerals? Refining? Helberg mentioned the initiative needs partners "especially when it comes to manufacturing and minerals," and the Philippines fits that profile. But walang concrete commitments yet beyond the promise of "fruitful exchanges."

Here's what we know:

What this really means: The US is experiencing "the largest industrial buildout in over 150 years," pouring hundreds of billions into AI infrastructure. They're reshaping global trade, forging alliances, and building what Helberg calls "a competitive edge so steep, so insurmountable that no adversary or competitor can scale it."

And that "competitor" everyone's avoiding naming? China controls 90% of the world's rare earth minerals. Pax Silica is about breaking that monopoly.

Ready ba tayo? Joining could mean jobs, tech transfer, foreign investment, and positioning the Philippines as critical to global AI infrastructure. Pero it also means picking sides in a brewing economic cold war. Kasi lmthis initiative isn't about free trade. It's about building a coalition against China's dominance in AI supply chains.

The question whether we can deliver or not. Kasi Helberg's vision is clear: build actual infrastructure, not just sign declarations. Can we pour concrete? Smelt steel? Refine minerals at scale? Or are we just another name on a coalition list?

In geopolitics, walang libre. Everything has a price. Ready ba tayo for the trade-offs?

Code red. That's what Sam Altman reportedly called internally in early December, pausing non-core projects and redirecting teams to push out GPT-5.2 faster. Why? Google's Gemini 3 was dominating industry leaderboards.

OpenAI just launched GPT-5.2, positioned as a major upgrade in general intelligence, coding, and long-context understanding. It's built for practical business use—better at creating spreadsheets, building presentations, and handling complex multi-step projects. Translation: less chatbot, more productivity tool.

But here's the context everyone's missing. Google launched Gemini 3 in November and claimed top spots on several AI performance benchmarks. That apparently rattled OpenAI enough to trigger an internal scramble. Altman himself admitted there was concern, though he downplayed it in a CNBC interview: "Gemini 3 has had less of an impact on our metrics than we feared."

Less impact than feared? That still means there was impact. And the "code red" suggests OpenAI felt genuine pressure to accelerate their timeline.

Meanwhile, Disney just announced a $1 billion investment in OpenAI, giving the startup access to Star Wars, Pixar, and Marvel characters for its Sora AI video generator. That's not just funding—that's IP gold. Imagine AI-generated content featuring actual Disney characters.

What does this mean for Filipino AI users? GPT-5.2 Instant, Thinking, and Pro are rolling out starting with paid plans. If you're using ChatGPT for work—coding, presentations, data analysis—this upgrade should deliver tangible improvements. But if you're on the free tier, you're waiting.

The bigger story? The AI race is tightening. OpenAI no longer has the comfortable lead it once enjoyed. Google's catching up, and that competition is forcing faster innovation cycles. Good for users who get better tools faster. Stressful for companies trying to maintain dominance.

May dalawang heavyweight AI models ngayon: OpenAI's GPT-5.2 at Google's Gemini 3 Pro. Both are powerful, pero magkaiba ang strengths. Here's the breakdown:

GPT-5.2 wins sa:

Gemini 3 Pro wins sa:

Pricing? Gemini 3 Pro is slightly cheaper per token (~$2/1M input vs GPT-5.2's ~$1.75/1M), pero GPT-5.2's token efficiency can offset costs sa complex workflows.

Real talk: If you're doing deep research, coding, or knowledge work, go GPT-5.2. If you're working heavily with visuals, videos, or living inside Google Workspace, Gemini 3 Pro makes more sense.

Para sa most Filipinos using AI for work? GPT-5.2's reasoning edge matters more than Gemini's vision capabilities—unless you're in creative, media, or design work where visual understanding is critical.

Bottom line: Choose based on your workflow, hindi based sa hype. Both are excellent. The "best" AI depends on what you actually need to do.

Stop asking AI "Which is better?" Make it show you the math instead.

Most people ask AI to pick between options and get confident-sounding answers built on guesses. You're outsourcing judgment without structure. Here's how to fix that.

Use this decision prompt:

Why this works: It forces the AI to act like a decision system, not a brainstorming buddy. You get: missing info identification → explicit priorities → quantifiable tradeoffs → sensitivity analysis → clear next steps.

Instead of vague advice, you get structured reasoning you can actually defend to your boss, team, or yourself. Try it the next time you're choosing between tools, vendors, strategies, or hiring candidates.

Thank you for reading today’s newsletter!

Rate mo naman para I can improve my future issues. Ilagay mo na rin mga suggestions, opinions or violent reactions mo!